Ron Paul Supporters – Lying Foul mouthed jerks afraid to debate

After I pointed out to another Ron Paul supporter that his friend Tiger was the one usig foul language not I and that it was Tiger that had challenged me to look at the Ron Paul ra-ra sites and Ron Paul’s record.  Well Tiger tucked tail and ran. He says he is 76 yars old.  Sounds more like he is 7 or 6.

————————

Well … you started it … an insult is still an insult no matter what ‘words’ are used … words are just words … nothing more … it depends on what you make of them … I chose my words very carefully because they demonstrated my opinion and common meaning … as to your positions on Ron Paul …

I can neither say yea or nay on them because they are your opinion … and everybody is entitled to their own opinion and this country was founded on freedom of speech … regardless of whether you agree or disagree … wars have been fought for that right …

I honestly don’t have time to continue this debate … I’m 76 years old and have better things to do with my time that to engage in useless rhetoric that will get neither of us anywhere … I give up … you win … nuff said …

————————

Interesting…

I started nothing.  I sent a personal email to John Pierce in reply to a bogus non-story that the “Military” supports Ron Paul.  John forwarded that onto his list and the first sentence out of your fingers to me was “You tell that piece of shit that wrote that about Ron Paul that he is really full of it”.  How did I “start anything with you?  Before your verbal broadside I had not had the displeasure of making your acquaintance.

You said: “Here’s my challenge to you … can you name one position or issue that Ron Paul has that you would disagree with … that would be a good place to start … that is if you wanna win this debate … “ and “Posted there you will find ‘101 Reasons’ to favor Ron Paul … if you want to debate any of these facts … I’ll gladly pick up the brick !!!I provided you a starting list of nine specific issues and provided you the facts not just the “points” on his record of overwhelming under-achievement as a Congressman and why that would be a burden on any possibility of a Ron Paul Presidency.

Well I guess I’m glad to see that you admit that you are wrong and don’t know what you are talking about.  Obviously you are unable to show me that I’m wrong on ANYTHING I have said (only to offer ad hominem attacks).

You also prop up another straw man (what a weak debate tactic) hiding behind th  First Amendment.  I did not attack your freedom of speech.  I just pointed out, in replay to “hio177@tulsaconnect.com” that you were the one using profanity – not I.

You accuse me of “hiding” but I sign ALL my emails with my name.  You are the one hiding behind the nom de plume of “Tiger”.

So, go slink back into the anonymity that you so richly deserve since you obviously can only do drive by attacks and have fully demonstrated that you are not a man of your word.

Maybe your new nom de plume can be “Hiding Tiger, Crouching Loser”

Good day “Sir”.